
             Lesson 32
           Galileo reborn
            ٤Եĸ

First listen and then answer the following question.
¼Ȼش⡣

What has modified out traditional view of Galileo in recent times?

    In his own lifetime Galileo was the centre of violent controversy; but the scientific dust has long since settled, and today we can see even his famous clash with the Inquisition in something like its proper perspective. But, in contrast, it is only in modern times that Galileo has become a problem child for historians of science.
    The old view of Galileo was delightfully uncomplicated. He was, above all, a man who experimented: who despised the prejudices and book learning of the Aristotelians, who put his questions to nature instead of to the ancients, and who drew his conclusions fearlessly. He had been the first to turn a telescope to the sky, and he had seen there evidence enough to overthrow Aristotle and Ptolemy together. He was the man who climbed the Leaning Tower of Pisa and dropped various weights from the top, who rolled balls down inclined planes, and then generalized the results of his many experiments into the famous law of free fall.
    But a closer study of the evidence, supported by a deeper sense of the period, and particularly by a new consciousness of the philosophical undercurrents in the scientific revolution, has profoundly modified this view of Galileo. Today, although the old Galileo lives on in many popular writings, among historians of science a new and more sophisticated picture has emerged. At the same time our sympathy fro Galileo's opponents ahs grown somewhat. His telescopic observations are justly immortal; they aroused great interest at the time, they had important theoretical consequences, and they provided a striking demonstration of the potentialities hidden in instruments and apparatus. But can we blame those who looked and failed to see what Galileo saw, if we remember that to use a telescope at the limit of its powers calls for long experience and intimate familiarity with one's instrument? Was the philosopher who refused to look through Galileo's telescope more culpable than those who alleged that the spiral nebulae observed with Lord Rosse's great telescope in the eighteen-forties were scratches left by the grinder? We can perhaps forgive those who said the moons of Jupiter were produced by Galileo's spyglass if we recall that in his day, as for centuries before, curved glass was the popular contrivance for producing not truth but illusion, untruth; and if a single curved glass would distort nature, how much more would a pair of them?
           MICHAEL HOSKIN Galileo Reborn from The Listener

New words and expressions ʺͶ
    controversy
n.  飬
    dust
n.  ףɧ
    clash
n.  ͻ
    Inquisition
n.  ̵ģڽ̷ͥ
    perspective
n.  ۵㣬
    despise
v.  
    generalize
v.  
    undercurrent
n.  Ǳ
    theoretical
adj. ϵ
    potentiality
n.  Ǳ
    intimate
adj. 꾡
    familiarity
n.  Ϥ
    culpable
adj. Ӧǲ
    Aristotelian
n.  ʿѧɵ
    Aristotle
n.  ʿ£Ԫǰ384-322ϣѧң
    Ptolemy
n.  ܣԪ90-168ϣѧң
    Leaning Tower of Pisa
    б
    spiral 
adj. ״
    nebula
n.  
    scratch
n.  
    contrivance
n.  е
    distort
v.  


ο
    ٤ʱǼսġǣǳѧϵķƽϢڽ̷ͥͻǽҲȷʵؿ֮£ڿѧʷ˵٤ִֻűһµ⡣
    ˸˵ǣȥ٤ԵĿӡǸʵ鹤ߣʿѧɵƫͿն鱾֪ʶȻ⣬󵨵صóۡǵһԶ׼յˣ۲쵽۾԰ʿºһƷǸϱбˣǸʹб¹Ȼ󽫶ʵ嶨ɵˡ
    ǣǸʱ˽⣬ԿѧҸѧǱʶΪݣһϸоͻἫظı٤ԵĿ죬Ȼѹʵ٤Լͨ׶Уڿѧʷм䣬һµĸӸӵ٤ˡͬʱǶ٤ԵķɵͬҲӡ٤ԶĹ۲ȷʵǲģЩ۲쵱ʱǼȤҪ壬ʾǱǱǣ뵽һܱ޵ԶҪڵľͶԼϤ̶ȣôôȥ𱸹۲յûп٤ĶЩأĳλѧܾʹ٤ԵԶȥ۲գ1940Ӳ˹ѫ߱Զ۲⵽״˵ĥµĥۡѵ٤Եѧұڮ˹ѫҥӦܵǴǻһ٤֮ǰڼ䣬澵һֱһڲӰǲİϷװãôǾͻԭЩʱ٤Թ۲쵽ľ˵٤СԶǣοһƬ澵ͿȻô٤ԵƬ澵Ȼָöأ